Concerning Life as It Is Supposed to Be

Month: February 2010 Page 2 of 4

New York, I Lust You

There are similarities between the French film Paris, je t’aime and the American film New York, I Love You. Both are collaborative efforts by a stable full of directors and writers. Both are set in major cities. Both deal with the relationships between men and women.

But the similarities end quickly, and end where it really matters: the quality of the content. I could not finish this movie.

I am a huge fan of Paris, je t’aime. But where Paris is sweet, New York is coarse. I am not naïve and prudish. I know that sex is a part of life, of fallen life and redeemed life. I expect that where brokenness and wholeness are experienced, it will be revealed in this most intimate of human relationships. But when sex becomes just a prop, and when nothing is left to one’s imagination, a line is crossed.

Perhaps there was a redeeming moment somewhere late in the film. If there was, I’m willing to hear. But I’m not sure that I will want to wade through what I was seeing to get there.

I confess that my expectations of this film had been dampened by the generally poor reviews it received. Sadly, viewing it confirmed those low expectations.

———-

For a contrast, you might consider checking out films from this list of the most redeeming movies of 2009.

Re-Centered Parental Priorities

My creative son drew me a cartoon Sunday morning to tape to my study door, already covered with the likes of “Baby Blues”, “Grimm”, “Non Sequitur”, and others.

His cartoon is pretty good, so up it will go.

But the real insight was on the back. He told me that this would be the first in a series of cartoons, and so on the back he drew pictures of each character over a brief description.

Don’t ask me where he learned how to do this stuff.

There are four characters – a mom, a dad, a son, and a daughter. The son is smart and ‘likes all kinds of science.’ Already sounding like a family we know.

The daughter is described as having ‘anger issues’. What 9-year old brother does NOT think his sister has anger issues?

The mom is, appropriately, described as ‘a loving mother sweet and calm’. That’s precious.

The dad? “A work loving dad (& family loving one).”

Uh-oh.

I’m glad for the parentheses, but I can’t escape what has taken top billing.

I took him to Starbucks today for some family loving time!

I’m reminded of Dan Allender’s story in his book Bold Love. Allender is writing a book about love, and so he wonders how much he’s taught his kids about love:

“I wonder how often love is truly taught and lived as the central priority of life. I asked one of my children what she thought was the most important lesson I wanted her to learn about life. She replied, ‘Work hard, do your best, and don’t lie.'”

She said nothing, he noticed, about love.

We can learn a lot when we listen to our kids. I pray for God’s grace to enable me to really, really listen.

Happy Calvinists

If I had time, I would reflect on and interact with Amy Bloom’s distillation of the keys to happiness:

The Fundamentally Sound, Sure-Fire Top Five Components of Happiness: (1) Be in possession of the basics — food, shelter, good health, safety. (2) Get enough sleep. (3) Have relationships that matter to you. (4) Take compassionate care of others and of yourself. (5) Have work or an interest that engages you.

But what fascinated me in her survey of current writing on the idea of happiness was this paragraph:

It is true that ever since Americans began turning away from Calvinism (and who could blame them: long winters, smallpox and eternal hellfire?), the country has been a breeding ground for good news, for the selling of paths to contentment. The quick-witted and genteel opportunism of Mary Baker Eddy and the medicine-free healing mantras of Christian Science begat Norman Vincent Peale’s “Power of Positive Thinking” and every other “Think Your Way to Wealth and/or Happiness” coach from Father Divine to Suzanne Somers to Deepak Chopra. With questions like “Are you tired of being a victim?” “Do you feel stuck?” “Is something missing?” “Is life passing you by?,” there have been a lot of people giving happiness if not a bad name, then certainly a moist, oily “spray-on tan with a side of cash” kind of name.

If turning away from Calvinism opened the door to all of this, perhaps a return to Calvinism might be a wonderful curative!

Academic Personality

When a scholar reveals personality in his or her writing, I’m hooked.

I recently began to read the first volume in an eventual four volume history of the world by The College of William and Mary historian Susan Wise Bauer. This first volume bears the weighty title The History of the Ancient World: From the Earliest Accounts to the Fall of Rome.

With a title like that, readers would be forgiven if they expected heavy going. To my delight, I find that Dr. Bauer is not afraid to add a bit of relish to the expected weight of knowledge and authority.

At one point, she references the frequent incestuous marriages of the Egyptian rulers of the 4th dynasty. It’s a fact that she could let pass, but she doesn’t. She comments:

“The alert reader is probably wondering, at this point, why all these people didn’t have three heads.”

Such comments make me smile. More importantly, they keep me reading.

I’ve been as well happy to learn that Dr. Bauer lives in the same world I live in. I like to see this from my teachers. So, at one point she is speaking of a mysterious civilization which had a propensity for order. In concluding her description of this civilization, she says

The spread of Harappan civilization was not exactly the ancient equivalent of an invasion by the Borg.

Realizing that not all her readers will catch the cultural allusion of such a reference, she footnotes it, beginning thus:

For readers who may be too young, or too literate, to recognize the reference….

Too literate?! A poke at those of us too erudite to enjoy a bit of Star Trek now and then.

Is such writing faddish? Is it looked down upon by proper scholars? I don’t know.

What I know is that if I’m going to enjoy history, I will read it when written by someone who is enjoying it herself. I will delight in what she delights in.

There is a lesson here for all who teach.

So, will I keep reading? With writing like this, what can I say? Resistance is futile.

Sanctification Revisited

A friend wrote to me recently:

The men’s group from the church I attend is starting a study of a book, which (according to the cover blurb) “men around the world” have been using for 35 years to “live by God’s terms,” and which will allow me to “reach God’s standards as a father, a husband, and a mentor to other men” because the author will tell me “how to make the grade.”

We’ve read such books, and though they can be helpful when set in the proper context, without that context, their demands can be crushing, especially crushing to men who are struggling just to roll out of bed without messing up.

My friend felt that my posts on sanctification from last year would help set the necessary context, so he asked for links to them.

I’m happy that these have been helpful. They are born of my own repeated failures, certainly not of my successes. So, for any who want to see these all in one place, here they are:

People Like You Will Never Change

You’re No Good, You’re No Good, You’re No Good

Where Can I Buy a Heart?

Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes

It Doesn’t Make Any Sense at All

War: What Is It Good For?

Forgetting What Lies Behind, We Press On

“With Painful Steps and Slow”

The Long and Winding Road

Lizards in the Fridge

No Buts About It

Dobby’s Gospel

Though not a part of the series, I include this one because, well, just because I like it:

The Locus of Halloween Evil

And, finally, I include this one for what it adds concerning the impact of grace upon a church that wants to be defined by the gospel of God’s grace:

Too Much Grace?

Housekeeping

Sometimes people show up at Somber and Dull puzzled by the strange name. Who would give a blog such a counterintuitive name?

Well, apparently I did. I understand, though, your puzzlement.

In preparation for a future move of this blog to WordPress, I adapted a previous explanation which I am reproducing below.

In short, the title is meant to be ironic. I hope you find it so!

< < < > > >

The title of this blog is intended to be ironic. but not everyone understands that. I may really be somber and dull, but I’m really not trying to be!

A couple years ago I decided one day to see what was involved in creating a blog. When it comes to things like this, I don’t read up on things. I just jump in and fiddle. At that time, I was only aware of Blogger, so I went to that site and began to create.

I quickly was faced with the fact that I had to give the blog a name.

At the time, I had been reading – re-reading, actually – Alan Paton‘s marvelous novel Cry, the Beloved Country. (Take this as an advertisement. If you are looking for a good book to read, pick this one up.)

The main character in the novel is a poor, black Anglican pastor named Stephen Kumalo (pictured here as marvelously played by James Earl Jones in the movie version of the novel). Paton introduces Kumalo as “a parson, somber and rather dull, no doubt, and his hair was turning white.”

Well, I’m a parson, and my hair is turning white. I’m not black, but the sobriquet ‘somber and dull’ was kind of appealing to me.

So, that was on my mind, and when Blogger asked for a name, in went Somber and Dull.

It has grown on me. I like the ironic tone. Either way it fits. If the blog is indeed somber and dull, the title is descriptive. If the blog is bright and interesting, then it suits the ironic intent. I can’t lose.

Enough of that. Now go get the book and read it.

“Magic”

Do you believe in magic? – John Sebastian

Could it be magic? – Barry Manilow (with help from F. Chopin)

It was like… magic. – Sam Baldwin (Tom Hanks)

Don’t trust the magic. – Randy Greenwald

* * * * *

Leave it to me to be the buzz killer. But actually, in my weekend article for the Bradenton Herald, my intention is to add stability to the spark, not to extinguish it.

Below is the article. Here it is online, though it will be accessible for only a limited time.

* * * * *

A Few Words about ‘the Magic’

It’s Valentine’s Day weekend – a commercial reminder to those who want a relationship that they don’t have one, and an occasion for those in a relationship to enjoy some ‘magic’.

My counsel to singles: Watch The Return of the King, encourage Frodo up Mount Doom, cheer “I am no man!” Eowyn as she slays the Nazgûl. Eat some popcorn and trust the providence and wisdom of a good God.

To those in relationship, my counsel is different. Do what is appropriate to the day and your relationship status, but do NOT trust the ‘magic’.

In the Meg Ryan/Tom Hanks movie Sleepless in Seattle what Annie (Ryan) is looking for and not finding in her relationship with her fiancé Walter is, we find out, ‘magic’. We are left to assume that she finds that magic with Sam (Hanks).

‘Magic’, that surge of romantic energy and emotion, is a wonderful thing. But don’t trust it.

It is possible to generate and program ‘magic’ by the right element of thoughtfulness, conversation, chivalry, and charm. And certainly a good and long term relationship will have sparks of ‘magic’ woven throughout.

But if all you see is ‘magic’, don’t trust it. Long term relationship is not about the ‘magic’. It is about commitment, devotion, and faithfulness.

Long tern love is a matter of daily wanting to have conversation with the one you love. It is a matter of forgiving one another daily. It is about refusing to go to bed angry, daily. It is about serving one another daily. It is about doing all of these things whether one feels like it or not.

Some days ‘magic’ will accompany service and forgiveness and conversation. Most days it won’t.

The movie Marley and Me is purportedly about a dog. But the real beauty of that film is the relationship portrayed by Jennifer Anniston and Owen Wilson as they grow together over time. Yes, there is ‘magic’. But there is also tension and argument and strife, as in any marriage. But there is also conversation, sacrifice, and forgiveness.

I overheard a family talking about seeing Marley and Me. A child commented that he did not think it was real. “The parents kissed too much,” he said.

Too much? I don’t think so. But that they kissed at the beginning and at the end of a long relationship was due more to the work they put into being friends than it was to magic.

Don’t trust the magic.

* * * * *

UPDATE: I surveyed a number of insightful friends for help on this article. I want to pass on my thanks to them!

Domain Name?

A weekend poll for readers of Somber and Dull:

IF I were to get my very own domain name under which to publish this blog, what name do YOU think would be best?

* randygreenwald.com (or .net or whatever)

* randygreenwald.com (again, suffix is not critical)

* randygreenwald.com/somberanddull

I’m not feeling particularly creative here. I need some help. I’m hoping there are some possibilities I’ve not considered.

There could be pragmatic reasons for using my own name and subsuming Somber and Dull beneath it, but it also seems a bit egotistical.

And if anyone out there thinks they can turn a buck by buying one of these and then selling it back to me at a profit, well, that’s not likely.

Thanks!

Death You Live With

This is why we so shrink back from risk.

A snippet (emphasis my own):

Creative endeavors are also always fraught with risk. Those risks may not typically be physical or life-threatening, but they certainly include failure and public embarrassment – which is, as a friend said to me recently, “a death you then have to live with.”

A Great Question

Standing at the top of the escalator at the Ikea in South Florida where we were helping our son and daughter-in-law transport a new couch, the following conversation occurred between me and my youngest son, age nine, which left me without an answer. He’s good at that.

“Dad?”

“Yes?”

“Why is it called an escalator?”

“Because the word ‘escalate’ means to raise or make higher. So, an escalator is used to raise people up.”

“What do they call it when it goes down?”

Page 2 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén