Randy Greenwald

Concerning Life as It Is Supposed to Be

273

273. This is the number of trick or treaters we had at our house on Halloween.

That is nearly 300. That’s a bunch.

Fortunately, I was not the distributor this year. That job fell to my wife, whose precision measurement and distribution assures me that we did not have 272 visitors or 274 visitors, but 273.

There are not 273 children living in our neighborhood. There are hardly 273 PEOPLE in our neighborhood. We are something of an outpost, a safe place for families from less safe neighborhoods to take their children. We don’t mind.

While I was not distributing, I was accompanying my own little Boba Fett around the neighborhood, which was a joy itself. But the circuit was made all that more interesting and delightful as I walked with my neighbor from across the street – Ed (Faoud, actually), and his wife Malika. Our conversation ranged from globalization to the books we were reading to the upcoming election to, particularly, the anti-gay marriage amendment being proposed for the Florida constitution and the place of morality and moral restrictions in constitutional documents.

I respect those who take a different approach to how to ‘deal with’ the whole Halloween thing. I really do. But this ‘event’ gave me an opportunity to spend some great time with a neighbor, growing more comfortable with him and he with me. I’m glad to have had the opportunity.

The bummer of it all was that I had purchased, I thought, sufficient candy to have EXTRA for me when it was all done. That was not meant to be.

Election Reflection II

Tomorrow is election day, and the hope is, of course, that all of you who can vote will consider the issues and vote.

Notice that I did not say that I want all of you who can vote to vote. That would be silly. The important thing is that you give the issues some consideration and then based upon your best reasoned judgment, you vote. This is a tremendous privilege, one which we who have always assumed it really fail sufficiently to appreciate.

And then, once you have voted, realize that your hope does not rest on the outcome of the election. It does not rest in the king, the prince, the president, or the senator. We do not trust in military might or a political candidate’s orientation toward Christianity or toward our favored issue(s). Should our candidate win, we should not think that the messiah has come, and should he lose, we should not despair as if the end beckons.

Two perspectives have crossed my desk, from men often at odds in theological matters. And yet they are in this regard barking up the same tree.

It would be worthwhile for you to consider these wise biblical reflections of Scot McKnight. I by no means embrace everything that he says in this post or in his blog. But I stand with him in the overall wisdom of these words. I encourage you to read the whole. Here is an excerpt:

Where is our hope? To be sure, I hope our country solves its international conflicts and I hope we resolve poverty and dissolve our educational problems and racism. But where does my hope turn when I think of war or poverty or education or racism? Does it focus on November 4? Does it gain its energy from thinking that if we get the right candidate elected our problems will be dissolved? If so, I submit that our eschatology has become empire-shaped, Constantinian, and political. And it doesn’t matter to me if it is a right-wing evangelical wringing her fingers in hope that a Republican wins, or a left-wing evangelical wringing her fingers in hope that a Democrat wins. Each has a misguided eschatology.

Now before I take another step, it must be emphasized that I participate in the election; and I think it makes a difference which candidate wins; and I think from my own limited perspective one candidate is better than the other.

But, participation in the federal election dare not be seen as the lever that turns the eschatological designs God has for this world.

As well, I would commend careful pondering of the God-centered perspective of John Piper. Again read the whole, but let this entice, or encourage, you to think:

So it is with voting. There are losses. We mourn. But not as those who have no hope. We vote and we lose, or we vote and we win. In either case, we win or lose as if we were not winning or losing. Our expectations and frustrations are modest. The best this world can offer is short and small….

So it is with voting. There are joys. The very act of voting is a joyful statement that we are not under a tyrant. And there may be happy victories. But the best government we get is a foreshadowing. Peace and justice are approximated now. They will be perfect when Christ comes. So our joy is modest. Our triumphs are short-lived—and shot through with imperfection.

Value

More to be desired are they [the Scriptures] than gold, even much fine gold; sweeter also than honey and drippings of the honeycomb. (Psalm 19:10)

Even allowing for a bit of poetic hyperbole, what would our lives look like if we really believed this?

I don’t mean that rhetorically. That is a real question. What would be different in our lives if we REALLY believed this?

Rovings

A few items of interest for those looking for such.

Apple is a religion (and here is our local high temple).

Some fascinating reflections on blogging.

Not all is well with the world. Be sure to read, though, to the end.

And finally, this, in the redundancy department (thanks to Seth for spotting this):

“You’re No Good, You’re No Good, You’re No Good”


Each Friday for a few weeks we are focusing attention on how Christians change. We introduced this topic last week by suggesting that change indeed is possible. We did not say that it comes easily.

Mr. Hyde found to his horror that his wicked nature was uncontrollable. Jeckyll could not be contained. That this is true is the fear of many Christians. There is a part of them whispering (singing, actually, to a tune by Linda Ronstadt), “You’re no good, you’re no good, you’re no good, Baby, you’re no good.”

At some level we know that this is true, or was. But we also are told that the Christian is a new creation. There is something about the old being gone, and something new being created. So, my correspondent poses this question, still in terms of the story of Jekyll and Hyde and in the light of a sermon I preached on the subject:

“What could he have done to save himself?” The point of the sermon leads to the answer: nothing. There was nothing he could have done to save himself. Okay. I got that. Now…what if Dr. Jekyll knew Jesus? How does living like a regenerate man who has NOT forgotten Romans 6 look?

This is an excellent question. We can believe that it is God who changes us, but we instinctively believe that there is something that we must do. What confuses us is that we are told that keeping God’s law is not the path to real change. That was Jeckyll’s downfall. Lawkeeping stokes our pride, and condemns us. So is there anything we can do to further change in our lives?

To frame it in a Romans 8 way, the question is this: what does it look like to “walk according to the Spirit and not according to the flesh” (Romans 8.4). Clearly living a Christian life involves “walking”. There are actions involved, choices, direction, duties, responses, whatever you want to call them. We either walk according to the Spirit or we walk according to the flesh. Paul’s point is that walking according to the flesh, seeking to do that which pleases God by mere obedience to law, is fruitless and worse.

So the question then is really, how do we “walk” according to the Spirit. There is a path. There are actions to be embraced which are fruitful, but not dependent upon the law. This can confuse us.

“In my struggles with sin, I am turning to the law to overcome the sin. For example, I pray for more patience, more self-control, etc. Would you say that this is simply depending on the law to overcome my lack of patience and self-control?”

No, I would not say that. To long for patience and self-control, among other things is good. This is to long for Christ-likeness. To long for the things of the Spirit, to lust, even, after the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5) is a good thing.

To deal with that desire by simply trying harder (“I resolve today to be more patient, and by gum, I’m going to do it!”) is to apply the law and depend upon the flesh for our sanctification. But to long for what the law teaches (patience) and to be lead by our own weakness to see that we cannot produce in it ourselves and therefore to plead with Jesus to build patience into us, this is a good thing.

There is much more to say than this, but to pray that the fruit of God’s spirit would be worked out in my life is not law-dependence. I need to keep in mind that the law is good. It teaches us what is good; it awakens us to our need, and it shows us what Christ-likeness looks like.

Frankly, to feel the weight of this struggle, as wearying and as frustrating as it is is a good thing. I think the more mature a Christian is, the more he struggles with the presence of sin in his life. For the impatient, the evidence that the Holy Spirit is in him is that this desire for patience is warring in him against a desire to have his own way at the expense of others. (Galatians 5.17 “For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, to keep you from doing the things you want to do.”)

So, to walk according to the Spirit is to first know (by the law, even) where we are supposed to be, as painful as it is to realize that we are not yet there. But where do we go from here. We’ll consider this beginning next Friday.

Comments are welcome. If you are more comfortable emailing your comments, you can do so here.

Pretty Downright Cool

So the Rays lost? Who cares when there is this to celebrate!

Post-baseball To-do List


Rays and Phillies fans are bound to find themselves in a state of panic today – some in a panic tinged with despair, others a euphoric panic. But after having must-watch baseball games nearly every night for the months of September and October, what are they to do with the extra three hours/night? So, as a public service, we offer these suggestions:

1) Read a book about baseball. This could be like methadone for you real addicts. I’d recommend The 33-Year-Old Rookie by Chris Coste (backup catcher for the Phillies) or Moneyball by Michael Lewis.

2) Get some sleep, for goodness sake. Go to bed early, get up early.

3) Sketch some ideas for some entertaining TV ads. After seeing the same four ads 86 times during the televised games certainly has demonstrated that most of us could do better than what’s out there.

4) Write letters to people – some real, live paper, snail-mail letters. It’s still possible. Four people in the US did it last year, so we know that it can be done.

5) Play some games with your family. The place to get your games, of course, is Funtoysia, if you live in the Bradenton area. Robin, the owner, is a seriously huge Phillies fan, but she’s still alright. They know games at Funtoysia, and we’ve gotten some of our favorite table ones there.

6) Go for walks. Lots of them. After spending an average of fifteen hours/week on the couch for two months, you could use some exercise.

7) Grab a neighbor you barely know (or your spouse or a child for that matter) and take them to Starbucks for a cup of coffee. If necessary, talk about baseball, but if you are daring, let the conversation roam. Ask them what they believe about God, and then just listen.

8) Take a challenge and read a book that will stretch your mind and deepen your relationship with God. Check out some of those listed here. If you don’t believe in God, or are skeptical about Christianity, there are suggestions in this list for you, too.

9) There are other sports that you could watch. None, though, can hold a match to the drama of the Rays’ season this year.

10) Use some of the time for prayer. Pray for missionaries. Pray for your family. Pray for your neighbors. But as you pray, remember to give thanks for ALL good gifts that our God has given us. Including baseball. I’m serious. And if you have trouble with that concept, read here why God enjoys baseball!

Halloween


I have a love/hate relationship with Halloween.

I hate a season in which themes of death and demons take over the shelves of stores and my neighbors’ yards. I can’t wait for the season to pass.

I hate as well the greed that overtakes those who should know better. This year I’m thinking of refusing candy to

• those taller than four feet
• those who come to the door twice
• those who don’t even bother to dress up
• those who are clearly adults.

I had multiples of all four categories come to the door last year.
On the other hand, I love the delight in my son’s countenance when given a chance to dress up in a costume and visit with his neighbors. (When he was five he dressed up as the only five-year old paleontologist on the planet. It was his idea, as was his greeting line, “I’m a paleontologist. I look for dinosaur bones and for candy.” Cuteness won him a haul.)

As well, I love an event that gets my neighbors out of their houses visiting with one another. And as Christians it does little to enhance our battle against the deep wickedness in our culture by turning the lights out on our neighbors’ children who only want to look cute and to get a piece of candy.

So, I long ago gave up the idea that somehow Halloween was going to usher in Satanism, and I embraced dress-up fun and neighborly camaraderie.

Just don’t come to my door twice.

Election Reflection

We are one week away from a major election in the United States, an election which has befuddled many and which will, upon its completion, cast a pall of despair over some and an aura of hope over others. I have some deep concerns about both candidates for president, and about both political parties. I lament the polarized environment in which we are somehow governed. I grow cynical over the way that political campaigns play loose with the truth. I take no joy in ‘debates’ in which candidates simply look for pegs on questions upon which they can hang their talking points.

I am a person with fairly strong conservative tendencies. I do consider raising taxes on the rich in order to fund more benefits for the poor to be an inequitable redistribution of wealth. Surely there is a better way. (I chuckle at the dark humor of the story of Joseph, lamenting how the entire Egyptian nation become the slaves of Pharaoh as he demanded and got a fifth (20%!) of all their produce. What is our standard rate?)

At the same time, I do believe there is a role of a government of the people in the work of caring for the people. One way that ‘we the people’ can care for one another is through the government we form. There is a role, if only in playing a part in breaking up the sinful systems which strip opportunity from those historically oppressed.

I can be won by certain elements of the rhetoric of both parties. And I find something deeply simplistic in those who find themselves one-issue voters, posing a shibboleth on some issue or another, and electing to office the completely incompetent on the basis of one treasured view. At the same time I find that I am one.

The office of president with its veto powers, and its power to sway the legislative branch and to stock the judicial branch can impact single issues in frightening ways. Given that, I simply cannot see myself entering a voting booth and voting for a person unwilling to stand for the unborn. I know that the issues of life go way beyond the issue of abortion. Life is cast away in careless military conflict and life is wasted when prejudicial systems are not battled and defeated. And yet I find that there are many who are willing to be advocates for the living oppressed and for the soldier being deployed to his death. But there are few who are willing to take a stand for the unborn.

I’ve been disappointed by the campaigns of both major candidates. However, I just can’t find room in my conscience to vote for someone who cannot see the continuity between a child born and a child unborn.

These are my personal views, not those of Hope Church. I know there are substantial counter opinions out there. I’m open to them.

I am Randy Greenwald and I approved this message.

Solitude

DSCN3399 1.JPGReligion is often a privatized affair among modern American Christians. We practice our faith alone, content to miss worship, forgo small groups, pray solitary prayers and not communal. To battle that, we at the church I pastor place a heavy emphasis upon community, challenging Christians to practice their Christianity in the community of the church. We need that and cannot survive in a healthy way without it.

Whenever one emphasis must be made, there can be imbalance. My recent reading of Jonathan Edwards calls us to the other side of this emphasis upon community: solitude.

…it is the nature of true grace, that however it loves Christian society in its place, yet it in a peculiar manner delights in retirement, and secret converse with God. So that if persons appear greatly engaged in social religion, and but little in the religion of the closet, and are often highly affected when with others, and but little moved when they have none but God and Christ to converse with, it looks very darkly upon their religion. (Religious Affections, page 376

Page 116 of 142

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén