Concerning Life as It Is Supposed to Be

Don’t Blame Autism

As we all are, I am saddened deeply by the tragic shooting at the elementary school in Newtown, CT. But I am also saddened for the millions of children and adults who will have an extra burden added to the stigma they already bear because of careless associations between this violent act and suggestions of autism or Aspergers Syndrome.

I hope that all would read this article by Priscilla Gillman, published the New York Times, and reprinted below. Very helpful.

Don’t Blame Autism for Newtown

LAST Wednesday night I listened to Andrew Solomon, the author of the extraordinary new book “Far From the Tree,” talk about the frequency of filicide in families affected by autism. Two days later, I watched the news media attempt to explain a matricide and a horrific mass murder in terms of the killer’s supposed autism.

It began as insinuation, but quickly flowered into outright declaration. Words used to describe the killer, Adam Lanza, began with “odd,” “aloof” and “a loner,” shaded into “lacked empathy,” and finally slipped into “on the autism spectrum” and suffering from “a mental illness like Asperger’s.” By Sunday, it had snowballed into a veritable storm of accusation and stigmatization.

Whether reporters were directly attributing Mr. Lanza’s shooting rampage to his autism or merely shoddily lumping together very different conditions, the false and harmful messages were abundant.

Let me clear up a few misconceptions. For one thing, Asperger’s and autism are not forms of mental illness; they are neurodevelopmental disorders or disabilities. Autism is a lifelong condition that manifests before the age of 3; most mental illnesses do not appear until the teen or young adult years. Medications rarely work to curb the symptoms of autism, but they can be indispensable in treating mental illness like obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Underlying much of this misreporting is the pernicious and outdated stereotype that people with autism lack empathy. Children with autism may have trouble understanding the motivations and nonverbal cues of others, be socially naïve and have difficulty expressing their emotions in words, but they are typically more truthful and less manipulative than neurotypical children and are often people of great integrity. They can also have a strong desire to connect with others and they can be intensely empathetic — they just attempt those connections and express that empathy in unconventional ways. My child with autism, in fact, is the most empathetic and honorable of my three wonderful children.

Additionally, a psychopathic, sociopathic or homicidal tendency must be separated out from both autism and from mental illness more generally. While autistic children can sometimes be aggressive, this is usually because of their frustration at being unable to express themselves verbally, or their extreme sensory sensitivities. Moreover, the form their aggression takes is typically harmful only to themselves. In the very rare cases where their aggression is externally directed, it does not take the form of systematic, meticulously planned, intentional acts of violence against a community.

And if study after study has definitively established that a person with autism is no more likely to be violent or engage in criminal behavior than a neurotypical person, it is just as clear that autistic people are far more likely to be the victims of bullying and emotional and physical abuse by parents and caregivers than other children. So there is a sad irony in making autism the agent or the cause rather than regarding it as the target of violence.

In the wake of coverage like this, I worry, in line with concerns raised by the author Susan Cain in her groundbreaking book on introverts, “Quiet”: will shy, socially inhibited students be looked at with increasing suspicion as potentially dangerous? Will a quiet, reserved, thoughtful child be pegged as having antisocial personality disorder? Will children with autism or mental illness be shunned even more than they already are?

This country needs to develop a better understanding of the complexities of various conditions and respect for the profound individuality of its children. We need to emphasize that being introverted doesn’t mean one has a developmental disorder, that a developmental disorder is not the same thing as a mental illness, and that most mental illnesses do not increase a person’s tendency toward outward-directed violence.

We should encourage greater compassion for all parents facing an extreme challenge, whether they have children with autism or mental illness or have lost their children to acts of horrific violence (and that includes the parents of killers).

Consider this, posted on Facebook yesterday by a friend of mine from high school who has an 8-year-old, nonverbal child with severe autism:

“Today Timmy was having a first class melt down in Barnes and Nobles and he rarely melts down like this. He was throwing his boots, rolling on the floor, screaming and sobbing. Everyone was staring as I tried to pick him up and [his brother Xander] scrambled to pick up his boots. I was worried people were looking at him and wondering if he would be a killer when he grows up because people on the news keep saying this Adam Lanza might have some spectrum diagnosis … My son is the kindest soul you could ever meet. Yesterday, a stranger looked at Timmy and said he could see in my son’s eyes and smile that he was a kind soul; I am thankful that he saw that.”

Rather than averting his eyes or staring, this stranger took the time to look, to notice and to share his appreciation of a child’s soul with his mother. The quality of that attention is what needs to be cultivated more generally in this country.

It could take the form of our taking the time to look at, learn about and celebrate each of the tiny victims of this terrible shooting. It could manifest itself in attempts to dismantle harmful, obfuscating stereotypes or to clarify and hone our understanding of each distinct condition, while remembering that no category can ever explain an individual. Let’s try to look in the eyes of every child we encounter, treat, teach or parent, whatever their diagnosis or label, and recognize each child’s uniqueness, each child’s inimitable soul.

Previous

My Precious-es

Next

Sanctification: Fixed. I think.

3 Comments

  1. There truly is not enough compassion in the world and we should all work to ensure we do not profile people or assume we have the facts based on what others say or conclusions drawn due to media coverage. The problem with society is that we have developed profiles of what we think children should be. As a society we promote the “cookie cutter” idea that every child should fit a certain mold. Our schools follow this pattern which is demonstrated with every child doing the same thing, at the same time, and learning the same way in order to be qualified to get to the next level. If it is contrary to society’s standard we think the child is weird, or odd, or something is wrong with them.
    We also blame the parents when a child is not the little angel that we think it should be. As a parent myself I can assure you that no two children are alike, and even children without any defined neurological disorders can display some pretty alarming behaviors that are quite contrary to the ideologies that we may have had when first entering parenthood. Even if we teach them to be respectable and well behaved individuals they sometimes behave contrary and then we as parents blame ourselves or may even question whether our own child is normal or may have mental disorders. If it is not our own child we really jump on the “judging” bandwagon and assume the child was not taught properly or didn’t have a normal childhood, which is what the media is promoting regarding the killer Adam Lanza. I feel very sad for his father who is dealing with undoubtedly insurmountable grief, let alone guilt, and is under constant attacks by the media.
    We may be falling short by teaching our children to follow the same set of guidelines, giving them the same type of love, and the same discipline, when in reality they may need a different type of affection, and a different type of discipline.
    I agree with Ms.Gillman that we should lay aside the assumptions and judging when looking at children. We should recognize their individuality and their uniqueness and tailor or parenting to this standard.

    • Your sensitivity is refreshing. Thanks for sharing. There are parents who need to be reminded that they are not responsible for their children’s poor choices! Hard to remember that, however.

  2. Yes it is! We blame ourselves enough without the additional burden of others criticism. Love and understanding are certainly slipping away from this society.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén